Volume 12, Issue 4 (2-2020)
ijhe 2020, 12(4): 639-650 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rezvani M, Tabibian S, Veisi A. The assessment of safety and health risk using multi-criteria evaluation technique and TOPSIS method in Ilam gas refinery. ijhe 2020; 12 (4) :639-650
URL: http://ijhe.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6307-en.html
URL: http://ijhe.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6307-en.html
1- Department of The Environment, Faculty of Agriculture And Natural Resources, Payame Noor University, Tehran East Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of The Environment, Faculty of Agriculture And Natural Resources, Payame Noor University, Damavand Branch, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of The Environment, Faculty of Agriculture And Natural Resources, Payame Noor University, Tehran East Branch, Tehran, Iran ,vaisiaa_il2005@yahoo.com
2- Department of The Environment, Faculty of Agriculture And Natural Resources, Payame Noor University, Damavand Branch, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of The Environment, Faculty of Agriculture And Natural Resources, Payame Noor University, Tehran East Branch, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (7360 Views)
Background and Objective: This study was designed to assess the safety and health risk in Ilam gas refinery and evaluation of TOPSIS method performance in risk assessment.
Materials and Methods: After identifying 955 hazards case, the risks were ranked separately in the health and safety sectors using criteria such as exposure level, severity and probability of the occurrence and use TOPSIS multi-criteria evaluation method. Due to the impossibility of determining the level of risk using TOPSIS method, the FEMA method was used for this purpose, and the risk number (RPN) options was calculated.
Results: In the field of safety assessment, personal injury, financial, burns and death from fire due to storage flammable materials in the warehouse, with a similarity to the ideal solution (Cli) of 0.56 was identified as the highest risk. In assessing the health risk, poisoning and impact on the health of employees caused by microbial agents due to the use of expired food in cooking in the restaurant unit as well as respiratory injuries of drivers due to inhalation and gas leakage in the process area and traffic of drivers in the site Cli = 0.66 was identified as the highest risk.
Conclusion: TOPSIS, as a new approach, is capable of being used in the industry's risk ranking and assessment. All the risks were placed at a moderate to low level. Despite the necessity of determining the measures to control the risks, these risks were not an emergency.
Materials and Methods: After identifying 955 hazards case, the risks were ranked separately in the health and safety sectors using criteria such as exposure level, severity and probability of the occurrence and use TOPSIS multi-criteria evaluation method. Due to the impossibility of determining the level of risk using TOPSIS method, the FEMA method was used for this purpose, and the risk number (RPN) options was calculated.
Results: In the field of safety assessment, personal injury, financial, burns and death from fire due to storage flammable materials in the warehouse, with a similarity to the ideal solution (Cli) of 0.56 was identified as the highest risk. In assessing the health risk, poisoning and impact on the health of employees caused by microbial agents due to the use of expired food in cooking in the restaurant unit as well as respiratory injuries of drivers due to inhalation and gas leakage in the process area and traffic of drivers in the site Cli = 0.66 was identified as the highest risk.
Conclusion: TOPSIS, as a new approach, is capable of being used in the industry's risk ranking and assessment. All the risks were placed at a moderate to low level. Despite the necessity of determining the measures to control the risks, these risks were not an emergency.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2019/09/22 | Accepted: 2020/04/25 | Published: 2020/05/20
Received: 2019/09/22 | Accepted: 2020/04/25 | Published: 2020/05/20
Send email to the article author
| Rights and Permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
