Volume 4, Number 3 (1 2011)                   ijhe 2011, 4(3): 255-266 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gholami M, Sabzali A, Dehghani fard E, Mirzaei R, Motalebi D. Comparative Study of SMBR and Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Processes in the Treatment of Strength Wastewaters. ijhe. 2011; 4 (3) :255-266
URL: http://ijhe.tums.ac.ir/article-1-57-en.html

Abstract:   (41861 Views)

Background and Objectives: One of the complete treatment processes for industrial and municipal wastewater treatment is membrane bioreactor process which has dominant potential in process and operation sections. This study was conducted to compare the performance of extended aeration activated sludge (EAAS) with submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) systems in the treatment of strength wastewater, in the same condition.
Materials and Methods: The initial activated sludge was brought from the Plascokar Saipa wastewater plant. The Plexiglas reactor with effective volume of 758 L was separated by a baffle into the aeration and secondary sedimentation parts with effective volumes of 433 L and 325 L, respectively. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration of the influent wastewater of the EAAS and SMBR systems were between 500-2700 and 500-5000 mg/L, respectively.
Results: Results showed that the SMBR system produced a much better quality effluent than EAAS system in terms of COD, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS) and ammonium. By increasing the COD concentration, the concentration of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and the removal efficiency of organic matter in the SMBR system, were increased regularly, however the removal efficiency of COD in the EAAS system was irregular. 
Conclusion: The average BOD5/COD ratio of effluent in the EAAS and SMBR systems were 0.708±0.18 and 0.537±0.106, respectively. These show that the organic matters in the effluent of the SMBR system was less degradable and thereupon more biological treatment was achieved. Nitrification process was completely done in the SMBR system while the EAAS system could not achieve to complete nitrification.

 

Full-Text [PDF 2063 kb]   (1678 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2011/04/18 | Accepted: 2011/07/16 | Published: 2011/10/31

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

نظرات کاربران
نظر ارسال شده توسط نام یا پست الکترونیک در تاریخ 2015/03/18
mahkameamirbande@yahoo.com

© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Iranian Journal of Health and Environment

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb